Conversation

I agree. I am not objecting to it. What I am trying to say is that, given the vast majority of women can bear children and, well, no men can, we have some job openings in high-risk-to reproductive-health-fields, even in the event that women could do everything better than us.
1
1
This is not some kind of attempt to label "natural" roles (except that, typically, women can give birth and men can fertilize eggs), but rather to say that the conservative image of man as warrior or worker ONLY is ridiculously naive and a bit condescending.
3
3
I realize I'm always putting myself at risk of being branded as a gender fundamentalist, since they employ such arguments in bad faith. But I think it's a real antidote to male despair to realize we can take risks with fewer repercussions than women, and to embrace that.
1
1
Peterson is completely right to point to male depression and suicide rates being very problematic. It is true that the traditional roles are dying, and no new roles are offered up. This is a problem. He just happens to be offering bad solutions.
2
3
Further, personal example: I am by no means a perfect husband or man, but I know at least one close friend of my wife's who was inspired to leave an abusive man because of our healthier relationship model. She now has a supportive, caring boyfriend, who is a friend of mine.
1
2
Show replies