Conversation

I agree. We haven't even touched on xenoestrogens yet, for example. My main critique of pomo, identity politics etc is b/c to me they're tools of late capitalism. Conviviality hard to monetize, thus constant atomization polarization etc. Keep people suspicious of each other.
2
2
The hilarious thing is that postmodernists represent a very, very small portion of Peterson's critics or ideological opponents. It's all grand narrative social activist stuff, identity politics, critiques of colonialism and capitalism and so on. Nothing remotely pomo about it.
2
2
I haven't seen a single interview w/him being questioned on capitalism. It's been brought up briefly in his convos w/Russell Brand & Philip Dodd though in each case the questioner hadn't prepared anything in sufficient depth to get around JBP's minimal precision requirements.
2
1
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Capitalism has already failed. Climate change/enviro collapse will be blamed on it, and it will die. We're just living in its twilight. It's not precisely about profit, it's about civilization level collapse.
2
2
capitalism is a great way of doing things, but it explicitly lacks the ability to self-regulate (despite what libertarians think), and if it "wins" by getting rid of or buying up those alternatives which do regulate it, it destroys its own ability to survive.
1
3
It can continue by burning off population. JBP's appeal to men seems simple: men are useless except for war or heavy construction. Women perhaps less likely to strike (at least violently). Fredrick Jameson says if you want socialism, join the army. He wants everyone in the army.
1
Men are not useless, though. Not even remotely. We have stamina, emotional resilience and a number of other things far in excess of women (yes, on average). There is no shortage of onerous tasks outside of war or construction that men are well-adapted to. It's a bait-&-switch.
3