Conversation

I agree. We haven't even touched on xenoestrogens yet, for example. My main critique of pomo, identity politics etc is b/c to me they're tools of late capitalism. Conviviality hard to monetize, thus constant atomization polarization etc. Keep people suspicious of each other.
2
2
The hilarious thing is that postmodernists represent a very, very small portion of Peterson's critics or ideological opponents. It's all grand narrative social activist stuff, identity politics, critiques of colonialism and capitalism and so on. Nothing remotely pomo about it.
2
2
I haven't seen a single interview w/him being questioned on capitalism. It's been brought up briefly in his convos w/Russell Brand & Philip Dodd though in each case the questioner hadn't prepared anything in sufficient depth to get around JBP's minimal precision requirements.
2
1
It could be that he provides adherents with ways of thinking about “returning to the past”, and that this engages them. (Photo shows Donald Schön’s 1971 “Beyond the Stable State”, which describes this in more detail). Trying to understand why he’s popular *now*, though.
Image
1
2
Show replies