This is probably the take that best explains his wild fluctuations between brilliant little insights and absolute nonsense.
He can't draw the line.
Conversation
He's acquired a much harder edge over just the last few months. I cut him some slack b/c:
1) he's not well, prone to depression & some autoimmune disorders.
2) I've had a shitload of grandiose ideas myself, usually unable to articulate them well.
Quote Tweet
Meseems observations are now opinions which means endorsements because why else would one be making observations unless one were endorsing them.
1
I'm curious as to what you find so alarming. Certainly there are far worse voices with perhaps somewhat of a similar audience, in that sense he seems to me a moderating influence.
And some of the hit pieces have been ridiculous.
1
1
I agree with the latter 100%, but I don't agree with the former at all.
He's buddies with Ben Shapiro, Molyneux and all the other bottom feeders out there. He doesn't do what he wants leftists to do and distance himself from the loonies - he embraces them.
Moderating? Nah.
2
I dunno about Shapiro, his voice alone deters me wishing to hear more, but yeah Molyneux is disgusting. otoh one could plausibly justify the convo between JBP & Molyneux as attempt to moderate the latter's listeners. In any event I haven't seen any 'embrace' beyond that one convo
6
The thing is I also know a lot of the psychology he cites (studies being, after all, just studies), and he does it responsibly enough when talking about psychology.
Then he makes wide, unsupportable assertions about their wider ramifications. He's like that a lot: untrustworthy.
1
I wouldn't use 'untrustworthy'. He seems earnest enough. He admits to a temper, & has been prematurely combative in some recent interviews
Honestly I could make a pseudo plausible, hand-wavy case for ancient art depicting DNA. Having it dismissed as von Daniken seemed a bit much
2
You can be untrustworthy without being dishonest, or do you trust your paranoid neighbor just because he's *really* sure They are out to get him?
I'm not calling JP a liar. I think he is just a bit too keen to spread his ignorance around. I should know; I have a similar flaw.
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Oh sure, me too. As I just told Michael, I didn't even have a problem with him stating his political views when he admitted they were reflections of his character.
When he started twisting all kinds of scientific findings and presenting conjecture as FACT, though...