Is there an interpretation of effect size magnitudes that is not arbitrary?
Avoid Cohen’s ‘Small’, ‘Medium’, and ‘Large’ for Power Analysis https://bit.ly/38g8Kd4 Opinion by Joshua Correll, Christopher Mellinger, Gary McClelland, & Charles Juddpic.twitter.com/3BnrocNgUv
-
-
-
Some are less arbitrary than others. Non-standardized effect sizes can be meaningful. Its also possible to interpret standardized effects around the distribution of actual effects observed in a field. In individual differences research, r's of .3 are largehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813 …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.