Nah, fuck Richard Spencer, he is a bigot
-
-
Replying to @patg0v @Trendlaser_ and
And in being one he actually is going against the first amendment
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @patg0v @shaun_vids and
No, wrong. If he calls for violence specifically against a person or group--then, he is going against the 1st Amendment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Trendlaser_ @shaun_vids and
you don't know who Richard Spencer is do you?
That's literally his whole shtick.1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @patg0v @shaun_vids and
I do. I know he's an a**hole. Don't agree with anything he says. But, he still has rights. Why is this concept so friggin hard for you to understand?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Trendlaser_ @shaun_vids and
I understand he has rights, he can say what he wants. Doesn't mean he's entitled to a platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @patg0v @Trendlaser_ and
Platform equals a public square. Freedom of speech is fundamentally for speech people find offensive, not for what you agree.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Flowerart77 @patg0v and
Glad you spoke up. I was beginning to wonder.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Trendlaser_ @Flowerart77 and
Hey violet, even if you say that, doesn't mean they're allowed on Twitter. It has rules that he is breaking lol
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @patg0v @Trendlaser_ and
Also the first amendment prohibits the government from making laws restricting speech, not Twitter and their terms of service.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Why should @twitter be different? You really think they can come up with a better more fair standard? I don't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.