Woke leftists right on cue not even reading what Dawkins said All these tweets condemn it ideological, political, and moral grounds just like he said. What are you even complaining about?https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512 …
-
The problem with eugenics is that everyone relates it to phenotype characteristics such as skin color and eye color, but not to people with Huntington's disease, dystrophy or diabetes ... Some genes shouldn't exist.
Should the genes that cause ALS exist? If we had taken measures to exterminate those genes we would never have seen Lou Gehrig or Stephen Hawking. Would humanity have been improved by their absence? I suspect the list of great people with diabetes is quite a bit longer.
-
-
I can't see a worse world if people don't develop diabetes or die of sclerosis, having diabetes or asthma doesn't make you a better scientist.
-
It doesn't make you a worse one. Eliminating those genes requires eliminating valuable contributors to the fields of science, technology, arts, philosophy... The inability to see a worse world is a lack of imagination, not evidence for your argument.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
This is absurd. You're deliberately conflating exterminating genes with exterminating people for the sole purpose of arguing against eliminating diseases and conditions that drastically reduce quality of life. Hawkins would have still been Hawkins without the ALS.
-
Hawkins would not have been allowed to have been born if eugenics had been in place prior to his conception. Eugenics is the use of selective breeding and sterilization to create superior humans. People carrying the faulty genes are not allowed to reproduce under eugenics.
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.