https://twitter.com/randpaul/status/1222951600072859649?s=21 …https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1222951600072859649 …
-
-
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
How do we know it was the alleged whistleblower if his name isn’t already public knowledge? If it’s already public knowledge, Rand didn’t reveal his name publicly.pic.twitter.com/vCbhrkkcYc
1 réponse 1 Retweet 4 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
How do you know the name in the question is the name of the whistleblower if the name isn’t already publicly known?
0 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
So, I’ll ask again: If the name of the whistleblower isn’t already publicly known, what about his question makes you think it’s about the whistleblower?
0 réponse 0 Retweet 1 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
-
There are infinite reasons a relationship could be relevant. Here’s some questions for you: Did any news outlets report the name of the whistleblower already? Did any social media companies issue policies around the use of that name? Did you know the name before today?
0 réponse 1 Retweet 1 j'aime -
Ce Tweet est indisponible.
As you can see, Rand Paul did not reveal the whistleblower’s name. The name has already been publicly known for months. That’s the only reason people knew his question was about the whistleblower in the first place. The law only applies to the inspector general.
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.