So if the transcript is ambiguous and a quid pro quo can't be proven what do Democrats do on impeachment?https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1176559966024556544 …
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
Rapidly informed that "We must see the full whistleblower report" is the next move. Deja vu to "we must see the underlying evidence of the Mueller report"
41 réponses 37 Retweets 210 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Saagar Enjeti a retweeté Matt Viser
Saagar Enjeti ajouté,
5 réponses 8 Retweets 50 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion -
Saagar Enjeti a retweeté Manu Raju
More: Pelosi says no quid pro quo necessary to satisfy impeachment. With these terms in place it seems likely that is where we're headedhttps://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1176565595158040576 …
Saagar Enjeti ajouté,
Manu RajuCompte certifié @mkrajuPelosi says there are number of “candidates” for impeachable offenses. “This one is the most understable by the public,” she says of Trump pushing Ukraine to investigate Biden. She says there doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo, saying pushing Ukraine to investigate “is not right”Afficher cette discussion13 réponses 7 Retweets 45 j'aimeAfficher cette discussion
En réponse à @esaagar
The Senate trial will go faster than the Green New Deal vote.
11:41 - 24 sept. 2019
0 réponse
0 Retweet
1 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.