That’s not what the word “defund” means. To defund is to stop paying for something, entirely.
-
-
Even if we were to fully defund the police (which may be the best avenue), we would replace it with alternative programs that do a better job, one of which would be a much smaller and properly trained group authorized to use force in those rare cases that need it.
10 replies 0 retweets 85 likes -
Oh yes, getting rid of police will totally stop crime from happening. It's magic!
6 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @LaurenLockliear @lacker and
Has anyone suggested that would happen? No, didn't think so. We need something BETTER than the police (social services, community investment, and yes, a specialized group that can still use force, but not abuse their power).
8 replies 0 retweets 68 likes -
Replying to @mojombo @LaurenLockliear and
a specialized group that can still use force is what policing is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ciapropaganda @LaurenLockliear and
I don’t think you’re hearing what I’m saying. Go back and read my previous tweets more carefully.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't think you're realizing how the real world works. Spend some time with criminals and in high crime areas and then let's chat.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LaurenLockliear @lacker and
Ah, so in your mind the current system is working just fine?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mojombo @LaurenLockliear and
The “so” tell for cognitive dissonance with the absurd absolute confirmation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
what?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
When someone says “so” followed by an absurd strawman, it’s a tell for cognitive dissonance. It’s an attempt to protect your worldview by avoiding the discussion. Look above. No one ever said the current system is just fine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Math. Conservative in some ways, liberal in others. Induced cognitive dissonance in both founders of Wikipedia.