.. Maybe because the uk is responsible for cutting half of the company out of the customs union and single market, making operations for a binational company extremely difficult??!
Unilever is facing UK shareholder pushback on its HQ move - now Aviva and the influential David Cumming plan to vote against it. @FT scoop by @AttractaMooney @labboudles Why should UK shareholders vote for this?https://www.ft.com/content/559eba16-b848-11e8-b3ef-799c8613f4a1 …
-
-
-
Much of the FTSE is made up of multinationals. Why should a UK shareholder vote to give up Unilever if there is not benefit for them - many may actually lose due to forced selling
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The argument against seems to be concerned with the quality of the UK’s main stock market index, rather than the interest of Unilever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To get a better return on their investment, thats why.
-
UBS analysts agree with you, report 9/10/18 titled: "Unification likely to be value enhancing". Makes case the Unilever will be able to more easily sell or spin off under-performing brands, and buy others.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.