The business case for partial privatization was that the company would grow and increase public shareholder value. Opportunities for expansion are mostly limited to the US. This was seen as a sound business move and is obviously also being supported by the new board and govt
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Overheard an investment type on BNN tell a caller than he would stay away from Hydro One because of Ontario Government interference, offered alternative utilities to invest in.
-
But, but, but .... we're Open for Business. Did they not read the sign?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@fordnation Go on Dougie how has your incompetence been good for us? (Assume I'm not slobbering drunk on crappy cheap beer.) -
-
But... but... really awful beer is cheap! (FWIW I don’t drink, not since my university days -years ago- I don’t like beer.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hey
@fordnation another screw up .@SenateCA Another blow to the Ford “open for business” government. Idaho energy regulator follows Washington state counterpart in rejecting Hydro One’s acquisition of US-based Avista Corp. Regulator cites “political games” played by Ont GovtThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i can't get a clear answer on whether these acquisitions would actually be good for ontarians or not. what's the over/under
-
one good thing is it would remove us from selling hydro to them from our grid at a loss....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But we're "Open for Shenanigans"!
#onpoli#fraudnation#DougFraud - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Oh snap. Love it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
