Tom WinterVerified account

. How can that b!? There were 650,000 of them! More than there was to begin with! How can they all b duplicates! We r not stupid!

You see, in the course of a normal human life we send email to people who aren't our boss.

. The classified emails should have never been in with private emails. 650,000 of them! This reeks of corruption!

Nobody who should actually know has said there were any classified emails in the 650k

. Nobody knows! There is no way they had time to look at all those emails!

Computers can compare emails very fast. They didn't have to print them out or even open them. A program can do it.

. It took them months to read much less last time! No way did they read all those new emails!

They don't have to read the emails to see if they are duplicates. In fact that would actually be a bad idea.

So where are the 33k emails that were deleted? Why were they destroyed after Congress requested them? Unbelievable how corrupt.

Some of them may have been among the non-duplicates, and apparently the non-duplicates have no problems.

gullible much? No way they reviewed 650k emails. Regardless, evidence was destroyed after subpoena.

I think you are the gullible one because you do not know how computers or email work, yet act like you do.

The subpoena didn't get to the person responsible for deleting the emails until it was too late.

that's bullshit and you know it.

You cannot know it is bullshit without evidence. The person had been ordered to clear the archive months before.

apparently you did not watch the hearings. try to educate yourself.

Nearly? They only need one to make the case and they have hundreds. Can't argued otherwise.

I don't think they would have made the announcement if they was a chance there could be one.

In a just world, I would agree with you. This case is a glaring example of it not being just. We KNOW she broke the law.

If we KNOW she broke the law, then there would have had to have been evidence of it and a trial. We don't KNOW.

You are trying to reason backwards to dismiss the given. Comey said she emailed classified info via her private server.

There were 110 emails classified at the time she sent them out of tens of thousands, but were any sent to Huma?

If none of them were sent to Huma, then they wouldn't have been in her account.

If no new classified information showed up in Huma's account then there is no new evidence, and hence this result