You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
3/ In the control, 77% are "likely" or "very likely" to report a crime they witnessed to the police. In the treatment, this drops to 41%. In other words, not having DACA means 36% would be LESS LIKELY to report a crime that they witnessed to the police (p < .001)
4/ 29% would be LESS LIKELY to report a crime that they were a victim of to the police if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)pic.twitter.com/Bde1ml4bTI
5/ 32% would be LESS LIKELY to use public services (e.g., go to City Hall) that required them to give their personal contact information if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)
6/ 48% would be LESS LIKELY to do business (e.g., open a bank account, get a loan) that required them to give their personal contact information if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)
7/ 36% would be LESS LIKELY to participate in public events where police may be present if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)
8/ 20% of those with children would be LESS LIKELY to place their children in an after-school or day-care program if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)
9/ 38% would be LESS LIKELY to report wage theft by their employer if they no longer had DACA (p < .001)
10/ Altogether, not having DACA would significantly impact the extent to which immigration youth engage with, as well as trust in, public institutions, and this would have wide-ranging effects not only on the lives of DACA recipients, but also their families and their communities
11/ We also asked about political efficacy. 6% respond "a great deal" or "a lot" when asked "How much do public officials care about what people like you think?" This climbs to 50% when asked "How much can people like you affect what the government does?" @POCalsoknow
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
