The Secret Service appeared to confirm a file on alleged incident existed at some point, asserting, “[T]here are no responsive records or documents pertaining to your request in our files,” because “the above mentioned file(s) has been destroyed” due to “retention standards.”
-
-
Show this thread
-
The Secret Service added that, “[n]o additional information is available.” It did not deny the incident had occurred. In its lawsuit, Judicial Watch intends to test the Secret Service’s assertion that it destroyed all records about the incident.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now we can throw in Secret Service as being corrupt along w/ FBI, DOJ and God knows what other agencies! This country is definitely going over the cliff faster than anyone ever thought! The corruption is so widespread you’ve got to wonder if there is any way that we will survive!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Certainly would like to know more about this subject please report more I would appreciate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who told them to destroy the documents? OBwan?a
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Was there “sniffing” involved?!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.