Who is paying for Judge Sullivan's attorney? Taxpayers, out-of-pocket, or pro-bono? In any scenario, Sullivan is not acting like a neutral and impartial arbiter.
Show this thread
Judge Sullivan is supposed to be neutral arbiter. But he hired a high-powered defense attorney to justify his bizarre attempt to force Flynn's prosecution. How can Sullivan judge this case when at this point, he's effectively a participant?pic.twitter.com/EnblJfttUv
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This needs to be investigated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who pays you? Who donates to your campaign? This case will be properly vetted and reviewed. Your best bet is to wait for the decision like the rest of us. Butt out!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He also may be violated the Code of Judicial Conduct. Noone is discussing this.
-
He should be bounced off the case for obvious bias. The appeal court should kill him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That "clown" doesn't answer to the DOJ. He's appointed for life
- Show replies
-
-
-
Because he’s a federal judge and you’re not, little Tommy.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
...Wait .....Wait Did I miss something? I remember something from law school about this being an ADVERSARIAL judicial system. So when a party decides not to go on...It's over. Was I asleep when we changed it?
-
When they told us “adversarial” we didn’t know it meant the judge!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.