Earlier in @RulesReps, I asked whether the Violence Against Women Act - under consideration this week - would also protect female abortion survivor newborns. Seemed to stir some confusion.pic.twitter.com/yM05cKFfkJ
-
-
-
BE QUITE MIKE
@TomColeOK04 is saving us from AN IMAGINARY CRIME that happens NOWHERE in our country!!! That is FAR MORE IMPORTANT than saving REAL Oklahomans. Obviously.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The confusion stems from the fact that you’re a fucking idiot who doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about. Your question is a non sequitur meant to draw attention to a made up problem to score points with your base. As someone who you supposedly represent, just shut up.
-
THAT IS NOT FAIR KALEB
@TomColeOK04 is doing important work! In fact, after this,@TomColeOK04 is going to make it illegal to break into the baby's house & steal all their Winnie-The-Poo gear. (That, too, is a REAL CRIME that is REALLY HAPPENING and is thus very very important) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If parents decide the most loving thing they can do for their baby girl who has fatal anomalies is to end the pregnancy early and let her die in their arms with comfort care only, would you instead require doctors to torture the baby with procedures and machines until she dies?
-
Yes. Remember, he's Pro-ForcedBirth, not Pro-Baby.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Another R who I thought was sensible and honest; but apparently has chosen to play the djt game of insulting our intelligence.
-
I'm the same way - watching him stand there and tell outright lies is such a disappointment. But then again his boss just announced that
#WindmillsCauseCancer so now I get it - they've started a Liars Club. Whoever can tell the most outrageous lies is boss.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.