Sorry--123 pages. Apologies to those wanting the additional 5 pages.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have any background or local news stories on this case?
-
The court decision includes background on what happened.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This ruling is HUGE. Police go through people’s trash all of the time - primarily to find evidence of drug use. Then with that evidence, police get a warrant to search the actual residence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In Indiana, there just has to be reasonable suspicion—so you can do a Terry stop, pat down the trash for officer safety, and then let the trash go its way. Litchfield v. State (Ind. 2005) https://bit.ly/3xtLy7C pic.twitter.com/hyyghsrgYA
-
Time to spray paint “Come Back With a Warrant” on the bin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, seems awfully similar to Greenwood, no? No reasonable expectation of privacy because it’s readily accessible to “children, snoops, and scavengers”?
-
Greenwood was a Fourth Amendment ruling--Iowa's court finds here that the Iowa Constitution provides greater protection.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Oh buddy, that one's gonna have a one way ticket to the US Supreme CT. That would be a big shift
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.