Borrowing a recent topic from @rygorous, if I could go back in time and change something in computing, NaNs would not be a thing.
-
-
* reflexive equality
-
* argh not that either, for all x, x==x.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If my code ever gives me NAN I consider myself a bad programmer, but I did use NAN once to sort an array so I am a bad programmer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Infinity is too useful to eliminate. It makes things like bbox computation trivially simple (to handle values like _empty_ and _universe_).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.