it's a big irony that constexpr is interpreted code. i'm fighting quite a bit with that in my compiler.
-
-
-
like, what you want is emit machine code asap; even at constexpr level - then run that, take the results to generate more code etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are you optimistic we will see this in less than a decade?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.