Holistic: all parts of the program are correct when observed in isolation
-
-
-
Homeopathic: The program was correct once, we diluted it infinitesimally with bugs, and claim it's still correct.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
prove to me that Nihilist errors are a thing
-
CL-USER> (set 'nil 42) → Nihil ex nihil. (can't set SYMBOL-VALUE of NIL). (This "joke" is older than me)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trumpist: The code is terrific, and the compiler is WRONG. Sad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Relativist: your code is invalid, but only depending on how you define correctness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Epistemological: the code does something but you don't know what
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Malicious: Your code is otherwise correct, but actively out to get you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Symantec: I deleted your code but won't tell you why.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Deconstruction: your code needs refactoring New Historic: who wrote this shit? git-blame. oh I did
-
me every time I look at my old code
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.