There is no government involvement here. You are confused about the topic.
-
-
Replying to @BrandonLive @salamanderrake and
Tim was talking about Google, MS, and others voluntarily blocking child porn.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I was complaining about them spying on customer messages and reporting contents to third parties.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
I disagree with the description, but even then it's not the government.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonLive @TimSweeneyEpic and
MS/Google/etc own their services. If they want to scan for illegal use it's their prerogative.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
They collude with government to use private "prerogative" to bypass legal due process.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
BS. If I call the police because I witness a drug deal, that is not bypassing due process.
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I agree. But you're my landlord, you've entered my house, and you're digging through my drawers.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Not even remotely close. You are renting space at a self-storage facility.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @BrandonLive @TimSweeneyEpic and
The owner has signs that say no storing drugs, and has a drug-sniffing dog to enforce policy.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
-
-
I don't get it. Do you disagree with my analogy?
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Yes. I believe warrantless search of user data for law-enforcement purposes is wrong.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.