Here is @andrewclinick's technical presentation on UWP installation: https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2016/B809 …. One-click install, signing by any CA root.
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@andrewclinick one more question If I may : is the UWP support an open discussion? We're thinking Hololens for example. -
@ThomasNigro@andrewclinick Yes. What we really want is a clear Microsoft *commitment* to UWP being open in specific technical ways. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@ThomasNigro@andrewclinick what happened to "Epic would fully support UWP if/when it opens up"? -
@j_mezz@ThomasNigro@andrewclinick We will fully support UWP if/when Microsoft clearly commits to it being open in specific technical ways. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic Do you feel that Microsoft is going the wrong direction with UWP or are they doing the right thing but they're messing it up -
@cjrbeckingsale The capabilities and sandbox approach is great. What's missing is a long-term commitment to being open.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@ThomasNigro@andrewclinick presumably the sandbox has a cost though. Really want bypass that for games. -
@ssylvan@TimSweeneyEpic@ThomasNigro there is no sandbox for desktop apps converted. They can call the apes they do today. - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@andrewclinick thanks, that’s good to know. We’d love to run as UWP, but we’ll stay with Win32 appx for now then.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.