@aL3891 It is true that if you install certificates on a user's machine, they can sideload those signed apps without OS settings changes.
-
-
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@aL3891 This is how iOS supports corporate apps. But it relies on Windows allowing a win32 installer to create certificates for a UWP.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@aL3891 I don't see this as an open UWP ecosystem because it relies on a win32 installer backdoor that Microsoft could close at any time.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 documented, supported features are not a "backdoor" in any reasonable sense of the word.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 If your win32 games already have an installer, why can't a UWP one?1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 ... that sandbox. That's a part of what the add-appxpackage does.)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@DrPizza@aL3891 Microsoft invented registering file extension double-click handlers, so why does Win10 support all formats except .appx?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic
@TimSweeneyEpic@DrPizza "buring" ad "obfuscating" are relative terms. yes docs and ms comms can be much better, but this is public stuff0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.