I like the sound of this, and look forward to thorough technical details on UWP's planned openness at //build.https://twitter.com/XboxP3/status/705795213709561857 …
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 How would you do Win32 deprecation *without* the support of Google, Apple, Adobe, IBM, most businesses, US gov etc? -
@jackschofield@aL3891 Microsoft already shipped a PC Windows SKU that disallowed win32 apps other than Office: the original Surface RT. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic windows it self is built on exe files. That is not a reasonable risk. You are making an argument in bad faith imo -
@aL3891 I look at how intentionally difficult Windows 10 makes switching to Chrome, and I am sincerely worried about them burying win32. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 And being able to deploy an app package without the Store and without sideloading is now possible. Or soon. -
@ThomasNigro@aL3891 I look forward to hearing more at build. Would love to see a solution as simple as Mac .dmg. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aL3891 This is why I feel Microsoft needs to make a clear commitment to UWP openness. Feels like they're keeping their options open. -
@TimSweeneyEpic imo they already have at last years build (f.e. http://ow.ly/Z5iSn ), but sure they could and should reiterate on that. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TimSweeneyEpic@aL3891 Microsoft is still releasing new Win32 apps and telling devs & enterprise it's more powerful than UWP, won't kill it -
@bjorndori@aL3891 But they don't all win32 apps in the Windows Store. Why? Step 1, force consumer software into UWP? What is step 2? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.