If you agree with Gabe Newell then why not try to follow his example and compete in a way that prioritizes customers?
-
-
-
We are competing in all ways we’re able, simultaneously, but different facets of this effort take different amounts of time to complete.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So you think you and/or Gabe will ever we able to breach the mobile storefronts? Imagine the innovation that could be had there if a more open model existed.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Forcing users to a platform for a game ≠ competition. Speaking personally, I only have EGS installed for free titles. My life is on Steam. I can see new players starting their journey on EGS, but if the free titles stop and paid exclusives dry up, what reason is there to stay?
-
a collection of around 200 games you got for free?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Personally my problem with epics strategy is not that you’re competing against steam but that you apparently only make war chest money moves and don’t innovate or create any new paradigms that improve the consumer experience
-
Creating a better economy in PC gaming will improve the consumer experience because it will allow more developers to make even better games when they can have bigger budgets for their next game. Better games for us would be improving the consumer experience.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed! Valve's flurry of new features has pressured you folks into adding un-functional wishlists! :P In all seriousness, theoretically, yes. But *so far* you folks' approach has been closer to the Apple approach he specifically criticises, though I'm hopeful that'll change :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly, which is why I have been supporting GOG and not Epic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.