Individually, many proposals make sense. Together they are insanity to the point of endangering the future of C++. - Bjarne Stroustrup, 2018.pic.twitter.com/53jehdZfQi
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This is really a silly question. I'm hella new to C++ in general. But if the first argument in an AND or OR fails and implies a short-circut eval, then why doesn't C++ assume XAND or XOR to be required? Please be nice to me. xD
there is no XAND. XOR '^' is a bitwise operation, not a logical one. It operates on bits. Thus even if 5 && 3 == true, 5 ^ 3 would be 6, not false. Btw you can't even short-circuit them as the final value depends on both parameters, even for a logical XOR implementation.
bools are values too so I'm not sure what you mean. The code gauruntees that [b1 && b2, b1 && bool(b2), bool(b1) && b2] are equal to and have the same short-circuit evaluation as [bool(b1) && bool(b2)]. It's a bit silly but it's also the precise language definition of a bool.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.