Easy to say "monomorphization is awful and Rust should never have done it", harder to say "I want all generic functions to be compiled to bytecode and to embed a Rust interpreter in every binary".
-
-
Haskell has a uniform type representation. If you go down that road with a language like Rust you end up with Swift-like intensional type analysis, which gets hairy really fast.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
that was my exact thought when I saw this (as a Haskell dev, not having done much Rust). It's just the normal dictionary-passing implementation, but at runtime.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.