Whistleblowers need protection, for sure (including government whistleblowers, per Quis custodiet ipsos custodes). Are they protected rn? Not well IMHO, and again it is up to vigilant citizens to insist on this among other goods. I know of no machine that ensures it.
-
-
New entrants won’t be able to use that same playbook, so the regulatory problem is limited to incumbents and won’t likely spread to new entrants within current tech industry domains.
-
True, but we have to cover costs. If you can do it with your scale at 12%, great. Not sure here :-P.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure everyone knows, but even if most do know, many have a hard time doing much about it other than try to train users via direct channels, and even (lol, not really) Google search ads, to cut out the middlemen. See https://twitter.com/jasonfried/status/1168986962704982016?s=12 … and h/t
@wycats on these two images.pic.twitter.com/hmKcdHaO3T
-
Yeah, Google wants us to pay to run legitimate search ads against our Fortnite trademark as a way to crowd out the ads from scam sites they run against our Fortnite trademark. Brands signed up for one thing, but this is something else entirely.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If only they studied the Relationships between manufactures and distributors by the late 90s;). Walmart v every American manufacturing brand ;).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.