What monopoly and what crack are you smoking mate? How desperate do you have to be to support a baseless argument to start making bs up?
-
-
Buncha other platforms out there competing with steam, huh?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And to further prove how BS your argument is steam is even letting origin players invite steam players to play a game that isn't on steam.https://www.reddit.com/r/pcgaming/comments/an6lh4/apex_legends_is_an_origin_game_that_lets_you_link/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Are you being serious? EA has a wide line-up of their OWN games. They aren't paying publishers to make their games exclusive to their storefront which is what this entire outrage is about?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
EA is one huge company with lots of games. Epic and many other devs/pubs are smaller companies with fewer games. Some of us have banded together in the belief that it’s in our best interest to exclusively promote a new store with an 88/12 revenue split.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
No, it's profitable for you, not the consumer. If you think for a minute that this is going to work then you're embarrassingly ignorant. If the outrage and boycott around @
#MetroExodus wasn't enough to prove it then you best be prepared to actually become more hated than EA.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Competition between stores should ultimately be very profitable for consumers through some combination of better games and lower prices. We hear exciting things are happening for devs on other stores responding to Epic’s 88/12 split. Watch the news for the next few days.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
All right, simple question. How is this in any way beneficial to consumers? You do realize no matter how hard you try to get PC community to give into exclusive BS it won't work, right? Or are you that certain that morals are that worthless?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
We believe, based on a lot of data and analysis, that if all we did was release a store with an 88/12 revenue split, but devs were forced (through some combination of contracts and review bombs) to have the same price on an 70/30 store with 90% market share, nothing would change.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Clearly, Riot, Activision-Blizzard, EA, and others reached similar conclusions over the years. Each concluded they needed to launch a new store based on some combination of the following: free games, better prices, exclusive games, features.
-
-
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic @Subhan_Sha and
We’re working on features and that’ll take time. The rest we’re doing now and will continue doing over time.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimSweeneyEpic @Subhan_Sha and
This is why it’s worth considering the proposition that adopting an additional store is worthwhile in the long term. Of course, the effort of installing and dealing with another store is right now, and the benefits will only build up over time.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.