"Tortious Interfernce with business dealings" suits filed by Texas based figures is all the rage right now
-
-
Interesting. I don't think that applies here but the best of luck to his law team if he tries to prove it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
There's at lest dozens of tweets from
@gaywonk that prove it though, especially in Texas.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Tortious Interference seems to be, at least to my layman's understanding, something seperate from what has occurred in this case. I think at best this would fall under contract law and youtube's application of their policies since crowder agreed to them when using the site.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
While you have a layman's understanding of it, I have learned from an actual lawyer that that is what it is. He will approach YouTube from a different angle I suspect since they made up rules on the fly yesterday to make this ruling.
@gaywonk and@vox will get torts I wager tho1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimBlack1976 @TeamYouTube and
Im sure you have. Reading the definition of "Tortious Interference with business dealings" doesn't seem to bear that out. Also given that they told him what he has to do to be in compliance of their policies seems to indicate that this is a contractual issue
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zgf2022 @TeamYouTube and
@shane_holmberg said much the same about a similar and he was wrong and the lawyer in question was right.@gaywonk said things on Twitter that caused easily proved damage to Crowdre's perspective business dealings in the future.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimBlack1976 @TeamYouTube and
Perspective future dealings wouldn't fall under Tortious Interference with business dealings, sounds more like defamation of some sort. Im at work id look into it further
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zgf2022 @TeamYouTube and
You are both right and wrong, it does fall under tort, but also business defamation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimBlack1976 @TeamYouTube and
Only if you can prove that
@gaywonk used his leverage to have@TeamYouTube deliberately break their contract with@scrowder Since he agreed to abide by the rules youtube laid down and they used those agreed upon rules to shut him down seems like that would be difficult to prove1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The proof is right there in his twitter history though.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.