It's easy for some people. It's not easy for others. There is a trade-off.
Is the goal to make it easier to access to capture the vulnerable, at the cost of a few "lazy" people?
Or
Is the goal to make it cumbersome even if there is a sacrifice of the vulnerable?
#mepolitics
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's not uncommon in Maine for one party to take care of the children so the other party can earn more, work overtime, etc. It's not necessarily irresponsible or a luxury.
My husband worked very hard as a merchant marine to support us. The pay structure changed at the same time childcare costs drastically increased. It was more financially responsible and logistically reasonable for me to work more hours and him to stay with our boys.
-
-
It's also been damaging to his career. He will face the same stigma women do (if not worse) when he returns to the workforce.
-
We are almost all one industry shift or life emergency away from needing aid. We should design it so it's easy, enabling, and encouraging to return to not needing it as soon as and when possible, being realistic on that possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.