See the really big line? It's for the donations to Rep. Poliquin from finance, insurance and real estate interests. #mepoliticspic.twitter.com/tFpS4c6XhX
Mom | Wife | Policy Nerd | Attorney | Mediator | Sustainable Tourism Nut | Want me in Senate? Do a @MaineRaising! Let's change politics together for good.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
See the really big line? It's for the donations to Rep. Poliquin from finance, insurance and real estate interests. #mepoliticspic.twitter.com/tFpS4c6XhX
After gun control, the next item up should be the removal of all donations from corporations , non profits, etc. Jane & John Doe can make 1 political contribution each of up to $100. Period. Will eliminate gazillions spent on campaigns & significantly shorten campaign time.
There is not the political will to do so.
Political will? The Supreme Court considers that unconstitutional.
We had one chance to overturn Citizens United. It was by electing Clinton and her filling the open Supreme Court seat. Those staying home and going for Stein, Johnson and Trump nixed that.
I am clearly, deeply, and personally committed to getting $ out of politics. I live that message in how I campaign, despite it probably making for a longer shot at the goal post. However, we do have a problem with there being the political will to follow suit and change the law.
Regardless of what factors made that happen, it is. I agree with you very much that our system is paid off. Until we send different people it is unlikely to change. That's the closest we have to a national referendum...though we know in Maine how seriously those are taken anyway.
So you’re dropping the absurd claim that all we need is the political will to change the law? Good.
The people we have sent to Congress, in aggregate, do not have the will to change this law, and they are the ones with yhe power to do so. Not sure how that is unclear.
It’s like you have no idea of the role of the Supreme Court in our campaign finance regime and how they overturned laws that took a lot of political will to enact.
It's like I think we have an existing situation, and that situation has 2 possible remedies, different law created by legislative action, or different law created by judicial ruling. I'm not assigning a value or likelihood to either path, merely stating those are the options.
Surely you’re aware that passing campaign finance laws means nothing if the Supreme Court considers them unconstitutional.
That would be the role SCOTUS has. That leaves the legislators the option to try different reasoning/drafting, an amendment, or confirm Justices with different philosophical leanings. The remedies exist with Congress and SCOTUS, which each have different checks.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.