That puts a burden on all of us to put forward good candidates, not just the most monied or the only one willing to run. We need to hold our own candidates to good behavior and good law. Review candidates individually, forget there is a letter after their name.
-
-
My argument is not that one side is not objectively better or worse, or that both sides suck. It's that sides need to be path preferences on generally shared societal goals not warring factions.
Show this thread -
Most importantly, there is no benefit in treating "the other" like the enemy. Even if we roll with the premise that the other side objectively is horrible, that doesn't change that they exist, vote, and won't be shot off to Mars in the near future.
Show this thread -
So approach the other side, whatever that is to you, with the intent to function together. The real secret is you both think the other side is nuts, and there are enough sitting out thinking everyone participating is nuts to turn the whole system.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.