...want to see what's in it?
I'll only have time to read one tonight, so let's do H. Res. 724
#ReadtheBill #mepolitics #ME02 #Bond2018 #TWPSBhttps://twitter.com/RepPoliquin/status/960941090198249472 …
-
Show this thread
-
Disclaimer, I do not work in employment law. Were I actually voting on this bill, I would phone a friend(s) to make sure I am not missing anything. First page is nothing sensational - title, sponsors, etc.pic.twitter.com/1IqGNAqDqW
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
P. 2 - There are a lot of references throughout that reference the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, without appropriate citations or specificity. A bit sloppy to me. A good use of staff is looking up references for efficient bill reading, it shouldn't take this long.pic.twitter.com/qxybPvwzMn
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
Seems to be a requirement to adopt an anti-harassment/discrimination policy, but not any *specific* policy. This does not establish actual regulations, which can be like footnotes where the good stuff is, which must (should) be done by 6/1/18. This bill establishes a new office.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @TiffanyBond
You mean like a new office that requires new dept heads and new employees and more govt money subsidies paying for this? How republican
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It is silent on funding. I think it would have been prudent to say the office could go after attorney's fees when appropriate. If there is a win, there doesn't seem to be a good reason why that could not be requested from a bad actor to offset costs of said bad actor.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.