...want to see what's in it?
I'll only have time to read one tonight, so let's do H. Res. 724
#ReadtheBill #mepolitics #ME02 #Bond2018 #TWPSBhttps://twitter.com/RepPoliquin/status/960941090198249472 …
-
-
P. 9 - adds sexual harassment as a protection against firing, then leads into sexual relationships with staff members...which is probably a good idea, but you all have seen political dramas/comedies, right? I feel like this isn't a super practical stance.pic.twitter.com/9NIdpNBvWe
Show this thread -
P. 10/11 - you can still have sexual relations if you are married to your staffer. So nepotism = yes, sex in general = no. I feel like there is something interesting in Sec. 7, but I don't know employment law well enough to put my finger on it. This would be a phone a friend.pic.twitter.com/Mpz49Dn7hu
Show this thread -
Overall, I would probably vote FOR this bill contingent on the following: 1. Answering outstanding questions 2. WAY better references 3. Some idea how it would be paid for and that it isn't merely symbolic 4. It should give legal counsel to pending actions...& how many are there?
Show this thread -
When you are voting for your federal delegation, no matter where you are, make sure that the person you cast your vote for can provide analysis of bills. It's probably not needed on each one, but they should be able to explain on request if not published.
#mepolitics#ME02Show this thread -
You should be able to get the following information: 1. How did you/will you vote 2. Why will you vote that way 3. What compromises did you make and why 4. Did you have any unanswered questions
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


I'm not playing go fish for another version tonight.