I do think we have a responsibility to try to help put the social structures we blew up back to a functional space, both to be responsible and because if we are trying not to create people with a vendetta, that seems the best path out. We've certainly done some of that.
-
-
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Where we are feels stagnant here thousands of miles away and absent security briefings. I would need more information, some of which would likely require clearance, to give an informed opinion on the best path forward.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Generally I prefer diplomacy. It's cost-effective, consent based, has a broader range of outcomes than are possible with war, and more likely follow through since it has acquiescence by all parties. There are parallels with war my day job. I'm a family law attorney/mediator.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Often one (or both) people drop a bomb on a relationship. You cannot change what has happened and are usually at the point of no return when I come in. But you usually have to figure out how to work together to move forward and have an exit plan. You won't fix everything.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
You can make sure everyone is in a sustainable place leaving and has a clear path out. I always have to plan for the possibility of a trial with an eye open to a range of acceptable solutions, some of which haven't likely been thought of yet.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Purse strings? There are too many budget lines to even attempt that on twitter. As an overall philosophy, I used to be financially conservative, I am now more fiscally efficient. We should be looking at both long and short term, winners and losers, and aiming for equity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Some programs are best administered federally (military, etc), some state-level or below. Some should be public, some should be private. We should be administering programs that make sense at the right level of government. Sometimes that means spending more, sometimes cutting.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond
Thanks for taking the time to respond to my questions. If I can have one request it's that you look into Modern Monetary Theory
#MMT. Read@StephanieKelton@rohangrey@wbmosler.. You will thank me!2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @folly_oh @StephanieKelton and
I am somewhat familiar with MMT. If elected, I'm sure more would be on my reading list. Exploring alternate solutions should be part of the congressional job description. Lawyering full time, campaigning and momming doesn't leave a lot of recreational reading time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @StephanieKelton and
Tell me about it. My only recreational reading is done at night.. and it lasts about 10 minutes, despite my best efforts. With MMT you don't need to read a lot in order to grasp the basics. It'll change your view of deficits (federal, that is).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I do have a MBA and am generally familiar. I simply had not thought of running for office prior to 2017, nor had it been relevant to my career to devote head space to how it interplays with other policies/law. I will likely have way more reading time in congress with commute.
-
-
Replying to @TiffanyBond @StephanieKelton and
If you have an MBA you'll catch on must faster than I did. I still need to google terms that any econ101 student could zip through.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.