Be mindful of *anyone* on very broad questions like war or budget that gives a short, resolute answer(s) with no flexibility and as if they have all the info when they obviously don't. It might make for pithy campaign slogans, but it makes for bad legislators.
-
-
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
I think in my lifetime we will be choice or structural need be on some type of universal or single payer. I also think neither party has been super pragmatic in how we handle healthcare. I like opening up medicare or medicaid to public buy-in so it's a choice-based move.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
"Profits" could increase coverage, lower out of pocket costs and increase payment to providers. Each year our congress should be actively working to incrementally address this issue. Right now we have the ACA, which is not great law...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Actively being undermined instead of improved, and by a political party that had 7 years to create what could have been a much better solution, but was total crap. Legislators should be working collaboratively to improve the lives of constituents with an eye to budget.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Instead we are electing people who are determined to make it a blame-ridden competitive sport. We have chosen this. In the fall, send a group of attorneys, scientists, etc with marching orders to improve your lives on a budget. You won't recognize congress, in a good way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
Send skill sets and ideas to DC, and not political parties and posturing. Send grown ups.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
I'll answer this here for the easier scroll "Do you advocate cuts in Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid? Which safety net programs do you support? What's your position on a minimum wage and on free federally funded college tuition?"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
I do not think we should cut SS, medicare, medicaid, food stamps or tanf. If anything they should be expanded. For Dem reasons, because it's humane. For GOP reasons because it's fiscally efficient and helps make the pie bigger for everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond @folly_oh
There is a streak in the US where we don't like the lazy and the poor, where bootstrapping is the way to go. It may not be supported by math though. Do we really care % if we all have more net? There are some interesting pilots on UBI. I'm not sold yet, but open to it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TiffanyBond
I prefer a jobs guarantee. Among other reasons, UBI is a disincentive for employers. Meanwhile there are so many jobs to be done.. to improve infrastructure & quality of life. And so many people who are unemployed or underemployed!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think the functional answers will probably be multi-faceted and have lots of moving pieces. Very few laws have a silver bullet solution. There is so very much good that can get done and a congress doing so little of it - in part, because they are not paying attention.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.