I see myself as more of a vote reducer than a vote splitter. I think my views appeal as well, if not better, to those who are unhappy GOPs and those who sat out last time. Besides, the Dems already have a split and a math issue in a 3 way race without me in it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
A 4-way final ballot is a more interesting race, and a less likely win for Bruce than a 3-way race (R/D/G). We choose our system, right? Let's choose different - reward moderation, incentivize not accepting any campaign contributions, elect someone who *likes* to read law.
I think a lot of people don't actually know what the job is. Candidates wax poetic about their beliefs...but the actual job is reading, writing, editing, and voting on very technical documents. We shouldn't send anyone who doesn't know how to and like to do that. IT'S *THE* JOB
-
-
I guess my push back is show me which other candidate(s) in the race have a proficiency for the job not the circus that is the job interview, then see who they take money from (and how they spend it or give it to)...then tell me who you agree with on positions.
-
If that's how we run elections, I would win in a landslide that rivals a 2017 inauguration crowd. While I've got you on the line, look at my fundraising. Maine gossips like no one's business. I don't want money. Help the district. Gossip is free.https://twitter.com/TiffanyBond/status/951140156022689792 …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm impressed if elected officials can even read. Tiffany live-tweeted her review of the "tax reform bill". That's nerdy and hipster at the same time, yet *neither*.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.