I see myself as more of a vote reducer than a vote splitter. I think my views appeal as well, if not better, to those who are unhappy GOPs and those who sat out last time. Besides, the Dems already have a split and a math issue in a 3 way race without me in it.
A 4-way final ballot is a more interesting race, and a less likely win for Bruce than a 3-way race (R/D/G). We choose our system, right? Let's choose different - reward moderation, incentivize not accepting any campaign contributions, elect someone who *likes* to read law.
-
-
I think a lot of people don't actually know what the job is. Candidates wax poetic about their beliefs...but the actual job is reading, writing, editing, and voting on very technical documents. We shouldn't send anyone who doesn't know how to and like to do that. IT'S *THE* JOB
-
I guess my push back is show me which other candidate(s) in the race have a proficiency for the job not the circus that is the job interview, then see who they take money from (and how they spend it or give it to)...then tell me who you agree with on positions.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I appreciate your candor and willingness to talk. We definitely need to let locals run their best races. I’m an Atlanta voter so you know your district far better than I ever could
-
I think we should be up front about it. We should talk about what we are trying to accomplish. I'm not nefarious going after the votes of those fed up with parties. That's how I win, and my district wins. Good law is not a competitive sport, it's a collaborative one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.