I'm confused by his statement. If prosecutors don't indict unless the evidence proves them guilty of a crime beyond reasonable doubt, then why do we go through the process of trials?
It seems that Rod has a really strong opinion on who should be able to discuss his view of the Constitution with him. https://twitter.com/RodRosenstein/status/1314220794227175425 …pic.twitter.com/KdjQ3cnPjE
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, isn’t it the preponderance of evidence in the Grand Jury?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If that were true then wouldn't the prosecutor be 100% successful?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, does he not understand the legal system. What about all those people who are found innocent in a court? Didn't they get indicted by prosecutors?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.