“The videos as posted clearly don’t violate our policies”
-
-
i've made it VERY clear, but i suppose, for you, i'll clarify it again. it wasn't always the fig. the fig exists now, but it has not always been the fig. therefore, it's easy to read as plausible deniability of it being a slur at present, given it was previously a slur.
-
at no point have i mentioned banning, shunning, ostracising et cetera. the only reason i am currently participating is to disprove that is has not only ALWAYS said "socialism is for figs" but that is has contained what is obviously a slur, and is baffling to read as much else.
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.