Thomas Varley, MPhil

@ThosVarley

Complex Systems & Computational Neuroscience PhD Student at . fellow. MPhil, University of Cambridge, Clinical Medicine (Neuro)

Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2019.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ThosVarley

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ThosVarley

  1. 2. velj

    I have no idea if this is appropriate analysis for a cephalapod but who cares!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. 2. velj

    Well this is something. A team put a squid in a 16T MRI to attempt to reconstruct a meso-scale connectome. From a squid. How can I get my hands to *those* connectivity matrices?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. 2. velj

    One of the most frustrating aspects of this thing is the sheer number of men on Twitter who seem to believe that simply working in Silicon Valley (often as venture capitalists) is equivalent to an epidemiology or virology PhD.

    Poništi
  4. 2. velj

    A sober, well-informed analysis of the existing data - it's too early to be making strong claims, but things are almost certainly *not* as bad as fear-mongerers on social media would like you to believe.

    Poništi
  5. 1. velj

    this seems like content you might enjoy.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 1. velj

    Fascinating oft-forgotten history of European witch-hunts and how early anti-Feudal, anti-Capitalist movements were lead by women - and the consequences of it all.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    NEW PAPER Early epidemiological analysis of the 2019-nCoV outbreak based on a crowdsourced data Kaiyuan Sun, Jenny Chen, Cécile Viboud.

    Poništi
  8. 31. sij

    Anyone with better math-chops than me want to explain why this is clearly ludicrous? I admit, I am stumped. I feel like it has something to do with the fact that powers of two can be satisfied with both positive and negative numbers, but that's all I've got.

    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    This is absolutely mind-boggling. Somehow Jacobs feels that the best rebuttal to is ... an 18-tweet thread quoting arcane insurance policy documents and suggesting that people *engage in insurance fraud* if they can't afford $1000s of dollars in COBRA coverage.

    Poništi
  10. 30. sij

    This is a nightmare. Kids are going to die because of this and I fully believe that the authors not only know that, but are actively in support of it.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij
    Poništi
  12. 29. sij

    Fascinating preprint by et al., that I can't quite wrap my mind around yet, but am very excited to dig into.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “If you’re a philosopher of science, you probably don’t take Popper’s philosophy seriously. But if you’re...a scientist, there is a pretty good chance that you think you agree with Karl Popper. I am here to explain to you that no, you probably do not”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    Or are these trajectories independent of any individual and instead emergent reflections of deeper cultural trends? If so: then it might be time to panic.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    If Leary and Alpert had been at Warwick, would the Ccru have ended up all blissed out and optimistic? If Land had been at Harvard in the 60s, would the psilocybin project be synonymous with nightmarish cosmic horror?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    I'm curious: given how both groups seemed to share similar beginnings, how much of the ultimate divergence is a reflection of deeper changes to our culture over the intervening 40 years, vs. how much is just the personalities involved.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 29. sij

    Accelerationist writing can range from far-right revolutionary fantasies of violence, to something rather like Milton-Freedman-meets-HP-Lovecraft in it's unrelenting horror.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 29. sij

    The Ccru thinkers (particularly Land) have become synonymous with an incredibly pessimistic worldview concerned with alienation, hyper-capitalism, digital anomie, and general modern misery. Accelerationism is the crowning jewel of this grim bouquet.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 29. sij

    What gets interesting is how the groups diverged. The Harvard group was, fundamentally optimistic about the role of their new spiritual technology in transforming the human race for the better. This cultural perspective still lives on in the culture movement.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 29. sij

    Both groups produced thinkers who had significant cultural impact in their own right: Tim Leary, Richard Alpert, Nick Land, Mark Fisher, to name a few.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·