"It would be difficult to find even a single country, ruled by Marxists, where the standard of living of working-class people has been as high as that of working-class people in a number of capitalist countries."
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s because socialism, at its essence, is war on work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
However, it's very easy to find cities in capitalist countries ruled by Marxists that have an overwhelming low standard of living for it's inhabitants. *cough* San Fransciso *cough* ruled by Democrats*
#poopindex#snapcrapThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More inequality = higher baseline standard of living for the lower classes. Less inequality = lower baseline standard of living for the lower classes.
-
A has=1, B=1. Equality. A has a big idea, studies the market, gets a loan, rents a place, buys machinery, gets lincensed, offers trainning to B, health insurance. Now A=25, B=6. Inequality. B makes 6 times more now. A=The opressor. Socialists tax A to give it to B. Next Venezuela
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You forget La La Land. Others were clearly not 'true socialism'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That country is called Liberal Fantazuela
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The more capitalist the more developed. Free market is the key to fight poverty. Simple as that.
-
How about that Democrats!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
hmmm. not so sure about that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.