Thomas Backhaus

@ThoBaSwe

Ecotoxicologist, Environmental Scientist, Academic, Professor, Photographer

Gothenburg, Sweden
Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ThoBaSwe

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ThoBaSwe

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    16. lip 2019.

    Episode 4 of Our Chemicalized World is out! This is the 2nd episode about pollution. Some details on recent reviews, reports and commentaries - and some thoughts on possible ways forward. Hint: think bigger! Enjoy!

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    16. lis 2019.

    The best way to find manuscript typos is to click submit.

    Poništi
  3. prije 2 sata

    Even after three absolutely disgraceful years: the Drumpf administration is still able to demonstrate that they can continue to sink lower.

    Poništi
  4. prije 3 sata

    and personal care products: how, when and why they enter the environment, especially agricultural systems. By and colleague/'s.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "When information is complex, people make decisions based on their values and beliefs. (...) Facts and evidence rarely help as much as scientists think." Check out this article with tips for getting the out there

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Ich bin nicht religiös, aber ich bewundere den Mut der Person, die den "Jesus würde AfD wählen"- Aufkleber gemacht hat. Der winzige Restzweifel bezüglich Gottes Existenz würde mich fürchten lassen, dass Jesus mich dafür so RICHTIG in den Arsch tritt.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Mit in den Kinos ab Februar wird einmal mehr Angst und Desinformation über das Impfen populär gemacht (zB darüber Impfen würde Autismus verursachen. Tut es nicht). Bitte klärt eure Mitmenschen über diese Gefahr auf und haltet mit Aufklärung dagegen.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    Environment & Climate Change Canada and Health Canada published their draft assessment of pollution. Addresses human health as well as environmental impacts.

    Poništi
  9. 31. sij

    Criticisms re EPA's recent conclusions (which basically stated that existing assessments don't need to be updated). Concerns especially surfactants in glyphosate products and worker health.

    Poništi
  10. 31. sij

    Von Kraft Prinz zu Hohenlohe-Oehringen (Na ja...): Geiz schmeckt nicht geil" Über Bioanbau, Lebensmittelpreise & Veranwortung von Landwirten Spannender Artikel, etwas einseitig. Solche verkannten Lichtgestalten sind Landwirte nicht immer. Leider paywall.

    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    The Constitution wasn't designed to deal with people who don't give a shit.

    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    Another academic nightmare becoming reality.

    Poništi
  13. 31. sij

    EPA published its interim review decision on No updates on previous risk assessments, although the petition to lower the maxium residue level in food from 30 ppm to 0.1 ppm still isn't decided.

    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    You see me more than just a little skeptic...

    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    Why? Why do some people not only presume they know everything, by virtue of them just being around (reading up on things is for sissies, of course) - but also spout their nonsense publically?

    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    aren't. At least when you use them for seed coatings and follow the logic of the US EPA Bad regulatory practice. Independently on whether might be better than their alternatives or not - a proper assessment is crucial.

    Poništi
  17. 28. sij
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    📢 Early registration for is now open! ❗ Register by 4 March and save! 👉

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    27. sij

    Happy to discuss our results of at . Good that the environ. minister have seen our data. Next: write the paper and present our findings at with and funded by

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 27. sij

    Ahh. The good old tune of "risk-based approaches" are superior to "hazard-based approaches". Ok. I bite. Let's go for it. So, where's the EU-wide cont. updated database on use (what, how much, where, when), so that we can actually implement the risk-based approach?

    Poništi
  21. 27. sij

    To all you environmental economists out there: here's a new working paper in economics, by Jessica Coria, one of our colleagues at "The Political Economy of Listing of Substances of Very High Concern in the European Regulation"

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·