Listen. I hear you, I understand you, to a large extent I agree with you, but this is still a conversation about penis skin
ARE YOU TELLIN ME THAT DOCTORS *JUST MIGHT* GET OFF TO CIRCUMCISION IM CHOKING BDNDBJDKSNSMNSDBDBDSNSMDNDNX
-
-
Undoubtedly there are circumfetishist doctors out there. My argument, though, is that it doesn't matter. The end result is the same: The child's genitals were violated--induced genital stimulation, forced penetration, and physical assault.
-
My argument is that you don't give a shit about rape survivors because you're comparing them to infants who will never remember it. Your self-centered worldview has you believing that a crime you don't remember outweighs the trauma that millions of women face. Log off, dumbfuck
-
I care greatly about all rape survivors and don't trivialize an entire class of them by fallaciously trivializing their suffering. Meanwhile, apparently you only care about victims who "remember it", which is asinine and insulting to all sexual assault victims.
-
You care about all rape victims? Why does your Twitter only have stuff about CIRCUMCISED CHILDREN lmao
-
Because rape is already illegal but male genital mutilation is legal and common.
-
Rape is illegal but Brett Kavananamaugh is going for the supreme Court despite a clear, supported testimony of sexual assault. What does that tell you about the state of being a rape victim?
-
If what he allegedly did is true, it would've been illegal. In contrast, it's perfectly legal even today to strap down a non-consenting boy--but only a boy--and violate and permanently damage his genitals. What that says to me is there is an egregious double standard in the USA.
-
Point went right over your head lol
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.