my book reading habit has an R_0 > 1, this is unsustainable
Nice hearing various arguments that I’ve heard piecemeal in different places put into historical context (Goodman’s grue/bleen problem, Hempel’s ravens, limits of falsificationism, normal science vs crisis vs revolution, etc)
-
-
Incidentally everyone focuses on the “revolution” part of Kuhn but afaict his account of normal science is much more important and seems to fit history better
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.