my book reading habit has an R_0 > 1, this is unsustainable
-
-
Nice hearing various arguments that I’ve heard piecemeal in different places put into historical context (Goodman’s grue/bleen problem, Hempel’s ravens, limits of falsificationism, normal science vs crisis vs revolution, etc)
Prikaži ovu nit -
Incidentally everyone focuses on the “revolution” part of Kuhn but afaict his account of normal science is much more important and seems to fit history better
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Kuhn is pretty short, and often poorly summarized by his opponents; would recommend. Godfrey-Smith was pretty dry. Informative, but not nearly as well-written as his “Other Minds”. I’d weakly recommend it, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there’s a better book on the same material.
-
yes, Kuhn has been near the top of my reading stack for years now, maybe this will push it over the top
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.