I don’t quite understand how he extends his stop-loss order analogy to no-backsies actions like having children - you can’t sell your children when the cost gets too high...
"Many otherwise smart and well-adjusted people have talked themselves into being the Ebenezer Scrooge of optionality, always hoarding the ability to do something later, never actually doing anything when 'later' arrives, and giving up a lot in the process"https://medium.com/@byrnehobart/optionality-is-for-innumerate-cowards-f2c5a759b607 …
-
-
-
Not legally, at least
-
You can put your kids up for adoption or disown them once they come of age
-
that said I think children fall under the pure courage bucket rather the courage to cut your losses bucket
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Billionaires especially
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel personally subtweeted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Almost by definition, perception has to adjust faster than reality (in particular perception of risk) in order to be useful, i.e., drive corrective action. In result there is a system bias towards over-perceiving risk and over-cautious action. There is no way out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.