He called you a "lispy queer" once. Stop getting your panties in a bunch. Jeez. Crowder created over 400 hours of content since Feb 1, 2017 (the date your first Strikethrough vid was released). You showed us an 85 second video. That's 0.006% of his content.
-
-
"Your honor, the defendant has been a law-abiding citizen for 42 years of his life, and spent only 2 minutes of it stabbing the victim to death, which is less than like 0.0001% of his life. The defense would like the prosecution to stop getting their panties in a bunch about it"
39 replies 11 retweets 302 likes -
The Wheel of Logic™ has been broken over my head.pic.twitter.com/lEluawXgnw
12 replies 0 retweets 115 likes -
Lol that was stupid that he blocked you but that analogy you made was also terrible, are you saying that name calling should be treated the same as first degree murder?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm trying to illustrate the fact that even though Crowder didn't engage in pointless, demeaning, homophobic slurs for the vast majority of his Youtube career, that doesn't at all excuse the numerous instances when he does use them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah I know, I meant it to be rhetoric lol But besides that, what do you consider a homophobic slur? The only actual, what I would consider a slur, is a lispy queer but even that is a fact. He has a lisp and is a queer, other than that everything Crowder said Carlos said himself
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted Carlos Maza
"Gay sprite", "angry little queer", insinuating that his love for chips is equivalent to his supposed appetite for penises, the list goes on. Just cause he self identifies does not give bullies a free pass to use the same terms in clearly hurtful rhetoric.https://twitter.com/gaywonk/status/1136057689585410050 …
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That is true; you're right, he shouldn't have said those things, however are you aware of the differences between a web platform and a web publisher?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 Retweeted 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣
I'm not sure why it's relevant, honestly.
@TeamYouTube themselves said they were hurtful at the very least, which theoretically violates their own terms of service, which is the crux of the whole issue.https://twitter.com/The_CO_Atheist/status/1136741293382672396 …𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 added,
𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙣 𝙀𝙜𝙖𝙣 @The_CO_AtheistReplying to @NoLogiclFallacy @mtraceyExcept their harassment policy literally states hurtful personal comments will be removed, and@TeamYoutube literally stated the comments were hurtful, (https://twitter.com/TeamYouTube/status/1136055351885815808 …) pic.twitter.com/8FtkvaRpwG2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @The_CO_Atheist @gaywonk and
But you see that's part of a much bigger problem, YouTube is a web platform (to not get sued for every piece of copyrighted thing uploaded to the site) and this is pushing the line pretty far since, even though it is hurtful, doesn't break the first amendment
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The issue isn't 1A, it's that they're refusing to do anything when presented pretty damning evidence of a large creator violating their own harassment policy, which they themselves admitted.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.